Popular Posts

Friday 18 December 2020

The Mystery of Labuan Chimney

Picture 1: Labuan Chimney
Source: holidaygogogo.com

The recent appearance of a series of monoliths in remote areas captured the public's imagination. Theories about who made the monolith and how it got there naturally came pouring in.  The same air of speculation could have been experienced by seafarers upon their arrival in Labuan more than a century ago. In 1915, 'Asiatic Pilot' published by the United States Hydrographic Office, reported the sighting of a "conspicuous chimney" that existed between the beacon at Bethune Head (Tanjong Kubong / Coal Point) and Raffles Anchorage (Picture 1).  This rectangular-shape 32 meter structure is constructed entirely out of red bricks.  In terms of design, this out-of-place artifact is typical of a chimney, but came with two arch-shaped inlet instead of the usual single inlet.  

The connection with numbers 2 & 3 does not end there. Mathematically the number of bricks used to build this chimney i.e. 23,000 is exactly 1% of the number of stones used to build the Great Pyramid of Khufu (2.3m stones). 23 is also the number of the Grand Masters of the Knights Templar. It was also the tallest man made structure on the island for about 150 years until it was overtaken by the 40 meter Labuan Corporation Tower.
 
Various suggestions were forwarded on the actual function and purpose of this chimney. The first theory is that it was a ventilation shaft related to either smelting, coal mining, or brick making activity. Nevertheless, upon further examination, the inner walls of this structure showed no trace of smoke or creosote.  Further, there are no remnants of a klin, tunnel, or main heating structure to which the chimney is supposedly attached to. 

The second theory suggests that it was installed for signalling purposes, i.e. either a lighthouse or a beacon tower, to guide ships to Victoria Harbour located at the southern side of Labuan island. I believe that the second theory makes more sense as the structure is located near Raffles Anchorage which served as a coaling station for steamships between 1847 to 1870s. I also believe that the four vertical lines at each side of the top of the structure represents the four lines in nautical flag signalling which indicates the existence of a port. (Picture 2).

Picture 2: Nautical ensign on top of Labuan Chimney indicating existence of a port.


Further, Labuan is situated at the north portion of the mouth of Brunei Bay wherein maritime traffic from the north of the bay could be effectively monitored. Based on its vantage point, I believe that the structure functioned as an observation deck, from which information about incoming ships could be broadcasted to Victoria Harbour and Labuan town using an optical telegraph system known as semaphore. 

At the end of the Napoleonic wars (1803-1815), optical telegraphy known semaphore signalling system (Picture 3 & 4) replaced the older version known as Murray Shutters (Picture 5).  Such signalling mechanism required lesser space and could easily be mounted on a tower.


Picture 3: Semaphore tower in the UK
Source: bidstonlighthouse.org.uk


Picture 4: Semaphore signalling system.
Source: Wikiwand.


Picture 5: Model of Murray Shutter at Portsmouth, Southsea Common.
Source: National Museum of the Royal Navy

Although semaphore towers for inland communication were extensively used in England (Picture 3) as well as British India (Picture 6), none was documented in their colonies and protectorates in Southeast Asia. 


Picture 6: Red-brick semaphore tower in Kamarkundu, India.
Source: livehistoryindia.com

Instead, in Penang, for example, the British continued to use Murray Shutters for communication between Bell Retiro (Bukit Bendera) and Fort Cornwallis, as well as between Fort Cornwallis and incoming vessels.  Photographs taken of Bell Retiro and Fort Cornwallis circa 1860s shows that Murray Shutters remained in Penang despite being replaced elsewhere in the colonies (Picture 7 & 8). In fact, the British in Penang further developed their Murray Shutters based on Colonel Macdonald's upgrade by adding more shutters, i.e. from the original 6-shutter to a 12-shutter system. With more shutters, the Penang version would have been able to convey a more complex combination of codes and signals.  

Picture 7: Photograph by Émile Gsell (1836-1879) titled "Habitation du Gouvernaur de Poulo Pinang" i.e. House of the Governor of Pulau Pinang c. 1866 prior to its 1870 renovation. 
Source: Leiden University Library, Amsterdam.

Picture 8: Maritime Flagstaff and sideview of the Murray Shutter at Fort Cornwallis, c. 1860s.
Source: Gutenberg.org


I believe optical telegraphy existed much earlier in the region. Sulalatus Salatin (Malay Annals), for example, refers to an earlier form of optical telegraphy practiced by the 15th century kingdoms of the Malay archipelago through the use of a variety of military ensigns and contraptions known as "tunggul", "panji-panji", "merawal", and "ambul-ambul". The only recorded proof of such practice can be seen in a 1568 Portuguese drawing of the siege of Malacca by Acehnese forces which shows the use of 'merawal' (elongated/pennon flag) on a three tier structure within the Acehnese fort. The system enabled the Sultan Aceh, Sultan Alauddin Ri'ayat Syah al-Kahar (r.1537-1571) to give strategic military instructions all the way from São Francisco (Bukit Cina). (Picture 9).


Picture 9: 'Siege of Malacca 1568' 
Source: National Library of Brazil.



The use of optical telegraphy and thus semaphore towers came to an abrupt end with the introduction of electrical telegraphy in mid 19th century.  Similar fate befell the semaphore tower of Labuan upon the implementation of electrical telegraphy in the region around 1870s to 1880s. Further, by the 1870s, Raffles Anchorage, which was exposed to swells of the north-east monsoon, was no longer used as a coaling station for ships. Instead, coal raised from the mines at Tanjong Kubong were transported to Victoria Harbour by rail. Shipowners and charterers also preferred to berth at Victoria Harbour as it is located on a natural deep-water bay and sheltered from typhoons. 

By 1880s, visitors to the island believed that the semaphore tower of Labuan was part of the facilities left by the abandoned coal industry. Frank Hatton (1861-1883) who visited Tanjong Kubong in October 1881 took several photographs of the surrounding area (Picture 10) and wrote to his father as follows:-

"The other day Lempriere, Everett (of Sarawak), and I went up to Coal Point - a famous place in Labuan - to shoot.  There is a deserted coal-mine there, upon  which thousands of pounds have been spent; and jungle is now growing all over most valuable machines, railways, and other gear; it is a very melancholy thing to see.  I will send you some photographs of it in my next letter. I am writing a sketch which I will post by next mail, entitled "Bungalow Life in Labuan. This life is very pleasant as regards sea-bathing, shooting, riding, and eating."

Picture 10: "Tanjong Kubong, or Coal Point, Labuan" based on a photograph taken by Frank Hatton c. October 1881.


22 year-old Hatton died in a tragic elephant-shooting incident at Kinabatangan on 1.3.1883, wherein none of his photographs of Tanjong Kubong surfaced except for the one posted to his father in his subsequent letter dated 2.11.1881 (Picture 10). 

A possible explanation as to why there is no official documentation pertaining Labuan Chimney's construction could be due to the fact that it was not built by the Royal Navy.  Instead it was probably constructed privately by a notable Freemason, James Brooke, who was at the material time, trying to promote the island to the British in a quid pro quo deal for their continuous military support. After the acquisition from the Sultanate of Brunei in 1846, James Brooke presented Labuan to the British. In return, he was appointed Governor and Commander-in-chief of Labuan in 1848.  Thus, I believe that the actual function of Labuan Chimney was to relay signals and messages via optical telegraphy to Victoria Harbour as well as to communicate with incoming ships. Perhaps due to its proximity to the abandoned coal-mine, it was mistakenly presumed to be part of its infrastructure. 


References:

  1. Asiatic Pilot, 1915, Vol. V, 1st Edition, United States Hydrographic Office.
  2. Bidston Lighthouse. Retrieved from: http://www.bidstonlighthouse.org.uk/tag/semaphore/
  3. China Sea Directory Vol 2, 2nd ed, (1879),
  4. Gupta, M. (2019, March 24). Mysterious Towers: Relics of the Visual Telegraph. Live History of India. Retrieved form: https://www.livehistoryindia.com/cover-story/2019/03/24/mysterious-towers-relics-of-the-visual-telegraph
  5. Hatton, F., (1886). North Borneo. Exploration and Adventures on the Equator. London: Samson Low, Marston, Searle & Rivington.
  6. Maritime Flag Signalling, Wikipedia, Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maritime_flag_signalling
  7. McNair, J.F.A. & Bayliss, W. D. (2008). Prisoners Their Own Warders. E-book retrieved from: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/26974/26974-h/26974-h.htm 
  8. Optical Telegraph, Wikipedia, Retrieved from: https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Optical_telegraph
  9. Pengepungan Melaka 1568, https://yusrinfaidz.blogspot.com/2020/04/pengepungan-melaka-1568.html
  10. Silver, L. (2015, November 02), Unlocking the Labuan Chimney mystery. Daily Express. Retrieved from: http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/read.cfm?NewsID=1766

Wednesday 9 December 2020

Istana Mahkota Puri

Gambar 1: Istana Mahkota Puri, c. 1910 rakaman Charles Kleingrothe (1864-1925)
Sumber: Leiden University Library, Amsterdam 

Antara gambar terawal Istana Mahkota Puri adalah gambar yang dirakam oleh Charles Kleingrothe (1864-1925) pada tahun 1910 iaitu 11 tahun selepas ianya siap dibina.  Pada asasnya istana yang terletak di Klang ini dibina oleh Kerajaan British pada tahun 1899 (Gambar 1 & 2). Ia dijadikan khusus sebagai istana rasmi dan tempat persemayaman Sultan Alauddin Suleiman Shah Ibni Almarhum Raja Muda Musa (1863-1938) iaitu Sultan Selangor yang ke-5.  

Rekabentuk istana ini adalah sama dengan senibina dan rekaan yang ada pada Bangunan Sultan Abdul Samad yang dihasilkan oleh AB Hubback. Walaupun tiada rekod, kemungkinan besar AB Hubback juga terlibat dalam rekaan Istana Mahkota Puri ini.  Tujuan pembinaannya adalah untuk memudahkan urusan pentadbiran DYMM Sultan Selangor dan supaya ianya berdekatan dengan pusat pentadbiran Kerajaan British di Kuala Lumpur. Istana Selangor sebelumnya adalah di Istana Bandar Temasha, Jugra, Kuala Langat. Setelah kemangkatan Sultan Alauddin Sulaiman Shah, ianya menjadi tempat persemayaman Sultan Selangor ke-7 iaitu Sultan Hisamuddin Alam Shah ibni al-Marhum Sultan Alauddin Sulaiman Shah (1898-1960). 

Antara gambar terawal Istana Mahkota Puri adalah gambar ini yang dirakam oleh Charles Kleingrothe (1864-1925) pada tahun...

Posted by History Buff on Friday, December 4, 2020
Gambar 2: Kesan panoramik gambar yang dirakam oleh Charles Kleingrothe.

Gambar udara Istana Mahkota Puri terawal pula dirakam oleh G.E Livlock pada tahun 1924.  Rakaman dibuat dengan menggunakan kamera peninjau yang dipasang pada pesawat udara jenis "floatplane" model Fairey IIID yang dibawa ke Singapura dan Negeri-Negeri Melayu Bersekutu oleh kapal HMS Pegasus. (Gambar 3).

Gambar 3: Sekitar ruang udara Klang pada tahun 1924.
Sumber: Imperial War Museums, London.


Klip filem terawal yang menggambarkan Istana Mahkota Puri juga ada di simpan pihak Imperial War Museums.  Ianya diambil sekitar kawasan padang di hadapan istana tersebut. Klip filem bertarikh 13.5.1946 tersebut dirakam semasa sambutan Hari Keputeraan Sultan Hisamuddin Alam Shah yang ke-48. Baginda dilihat tiba bersama pengiring dan disambut pegawai tentera. Baginda kemudian berkenan mencemar duli memeriksa Perbarisan Istiadat Kawalan Kehormat. Barisan tentera semasa istiadat tersebut terdiri dari Regimen Askar Melayu Diraja, Regimen Artileri, dan Regimen Punjab. 



Rakaman Sekitar Istana Mahkota Puri pada tahun 1946
Sumber: Imperial War Museums, London.


Gambar 4: Istana Alam Shah
Sumber: Asiatravelgate.com

Pada tahun 1958, Istana Mahkota Puri telah dirobohkan dan digantikan dengan Istana Alam Shah (Gambar 4) yang kini menjadi tempat persemayaman Sultan Selangor ke-9 iaitu DYMM Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah Alhaj Ibni Almarhum Sultan Salahuddin Abduk Aziz Shah Alhaj . Fungsi Istana Alam Shah juga adalah sama iaitu sebagai istana rasmi dan tempat baginda menjalankan tugas-tugas baginda sebagai Sultan. Adat istiadat yang melibatkan pihak istana dan urusan di Raja Selangor juga diadakan di istana ini.

Sumber: 

1. Leiden University Library, Amsterdam.

2. Imperial War Museums, London.

Advertisement


Advertisement


Advertisement


Saturday 14 November 2020

Serangan British terhadap Brunei dan Marudu (1845)


"Destruction of the House & Battery of Pangeran Usop" oleh Edward Hodges Cree, 10.8.1845.
Sumber: National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, London.


Lukisan bertajuk 'Destruction of the House & Battery of Pangeran Usop' ini dilukis Edward Hodges Cree pada 10.8.1845. Edward Hodges Cree (1814-1901) adalah seorang pakar bedah tentera laut British yang berkhidmat di atas kapal H.M. Steam-Vessel Vixen. Jurnal beliau bersama lukisan ini menjadi rekod utama berkenaan serangan British terhadap Pengiran Yusuf ibni Sultan Omar Ali Saifuddin I di Brunei dan Syariff Osman di Marudu.

Secara amnya lukisan ini menggambarkan keadaan kediaman dan kubu Bendahara Brunei iaitu Pengiran Yusuf yang dibedil oleh 8 buah kapal British pada 10.8.1845 (sebelah kiri lukisan). Ugutan "gunboat diplomacy" terlebih dahulu dibuat kapal-kapal British yang berlabuh dihadapan Istana Kampong Ayer (di sebelah kanan lukisan) dalam mendesak Sultan Brunei, iaitu Sultan Omar Ali Saifuddin II ibni Sultan Muhammad Jamalul Alam I (1799-1852), supaya memecat Pengiran Yusuf yang juga nenda saudara Sultan.

Ketika itu pihak British, atas fitnah James Brooke, mempercayai bahawa Pengiran Yusuf, terlibat dalam aktiviti perlanunan bersama Syariff Osman, iaitu pemerintah Kerajaan Marudu, dibawah kebenaran Kesultanan Sulu.

Menurut catatan Edward Hughes Cree, Pengiran Yusuf hadir di Istana Sultan Brunei untuk berbincang dengan British tetapi enggan bersetuju dengan terma-terma British. Beliau kemudian pulang ke kediamannya. British memulakan serangan dengan tembakan roket yang menembusi bumbung kediaman Pengiran Yusuf.  Serangan tersebut dibalas dengan tembakan meriam. Rekod menunjukkan bahawa atas desakan ketuanya, Edward Hughes Cree menyatakan bahawa Pengiran Yusuf yang memulakan tembakan terlebih dahulu. Walaupun berjaya melarikan diri, pengaruh Pengiran Yusuf terhadap Sultan Brunei telah berjaya dimusnahkan pakatan British dalam serangan ini.


"Paleis van de sultan van Brunei" (Istana Sultan Brunei) rakaman G.R. Lambert & Co. (c. 1890) iaitu di zaman pemerintahan Sultan Hashim Jalilul Alam Aqamaddin ibni Sultan Omar Ali Saifuddin II (1825-1906).
Sumber: Leiden University Library


Kapal-kapal British tersebut bersama bantuan sekutu James Brooke iaitu Pengiran Muda Hashim ibni Sultan Muhammad Kanzul Alam (1782-1846) dan adindanya Pengiran Badaruddin ibni Sultan Muhammad Kanzul Alam kemudian menyerang kubu Syariff Osman di Marudu pada 17.8.1845.

Kajian menunjukkan bahawa tiada satu pun catatan sejarah yang boleh mengesahkan bahawa Pengiran Yusuf dan Syariff Osman terlibat dalam aktiviti pelanunan.  Kebijaksanaan dan kepimpinan Syariff Osman, yang ketika itu ingin diiktiraf sebagai Sultan Marudu, sebenarnya adalah faktor utama yang telah menimbulkan rasa kemarahan dan perasaan cemburu James Brooke, pihak British dan beberapa pembesar Brunei. Jadi serangan-serangan ini adalah tindakan strategik James Brooke untuk menguatkan pengaruh dan agendanya terhadap Sultan Brunei; dan supaya tiada pesaing boleh mengugat kepentingannya sebagai Raja Putih Sarawak iaitu posisi yang diperolehnya melalui Pengiran Muda Hashim pada tahun 1841.

Selepas pengunduran Pengiran Yusuf, pemusnahan kubu Syariff Osman di Marudu, dan satu lagi serangan British terhadap Brunei pada Julai 1846, sebuah perjanjian telah ditandatangani pada 18.12.1846 yang menyebabkan Pulau Labuan dan pulau-pulau kecil yang berhampiran diserahkan buat selamanya oleh Sultan Brunei kepada pihak British. 

"The Expeditionary Force (Seamen and Marines 500 strong) under the orders of Captain Mundy accompanied by Mr Brooke in march for the Sultan's position at Damuan in the interior of Borneo, July 1846"
Sumber: State Library of New South Wales.


Sebagai habuan, James Brooke telah dilantik British sebagai Gabenor Labuan yang pertama dan Konsul Besar di Borneo. Pada masa yang sama, Sarawak dibawah James Brooke diiktiraf bebas dari apa-apa tuntutan dari Sultan Brunei.

Lakaran markas dan penempatan Inggeris di Labuan dalam The Illustrated London News bertarikh 9.12.1848. 


Tindakan eksesif James Brooke dalam menghapus musuh atas dasar memerangi aktiviti pelanunan tersebut menimbulkan kontroversi di mana satu Suruhanjaya Siasatan telah diadakan di Singapura pada tahun 1854. Walaupun James Brooke didapati tidak bersalah, namun siasatan dan pertuduhan yang dibuat telah menjatuhkan imej, reputasi dan mencemar legasi beliau di mata umum.

Sumber:

1. Gerlich, B.M., (2003), 'Marudu 1845: The Destruction and Reconstruction of a Coastal State in Borneo'. Hamburg, Abera.
2. Irwin, G., 1955, 'Nineteenth-Century Borneo: A Study in Diplomatic Rivalry'. Brill.
3. National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, London.
4. "The Rajahs of Sarawak", The Spectator, 29 January 1910.
5. "The Rise and Fall of a North Bornean Kingdom", Sabah Society Journal Vol. 29, 2012.

Ekspedisi Wilkes (1838-1842)

Kapal USS Vincennes, yang memuatkan 190 anak kapal dan merupakan kapal utama Ekspedisi Wilkes. Singapura adalah destinasi terakhir yang dila...